PERC Finds even Informal Labor Organizations may have Bargaining Rights

By Jim Cline and Sam Hagshenas

In Arlington School District, the PERC Examiner found that the District had violated its duty to bargain and had skimmed bargaining unit work from the ironically named Arlington Non-Rep Group (NRG). The school district did not believe the NRG was a union, but prior practice demonstrated that the District had historically voluntarily recognized the NRG as a bargaining unit and thus violated its duty to bargain.

[Read more…]

King County Found in Violation of Duty to Bargain Over Mandatory Overtime Related Medical Separations for Corrections Officers

By Jim Cline and Sam Hagshenas

In King County, Examiner Willaford determined that the Union successfully proved the County violated its duty to bargain by making mandatory overtime a condition of employment. The Examiner ruled that King County’s practice of medically separating corrections officers with medical restrictions on working overtime was a unilateral change to a mandatory subject of bargaining.

[Read more…]

Don’t Pick Up Your Toys and Leave When You Don’t Like the Union’s Wage Proposal

By Jim Cline and Sam Hagshenas

In Okanogan County, Examiner Todd ruled that the County refused to bargain when it unilaterally contracted out bargaining unit work to third-party security contractors after making the representation that it was rescinding its proposal to reclassify a then-vacant bargaining unit position.

[Read more…]

PERC Examiner Rules that Change to Comply with L&I Overtime Rules not an Unlawful Unilateral Change

By Jim Cline and Sam Hagshenas

In University of Washington, Examiner Bradley ruled that University of Washington (UW) changing bargaining unit employees’ overtime eligibility status to comply with Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) rules was not a unilateral change to a mandatory subject of bargaining.  

[Read more…]

Court Agrees with PERC that the Duty to Maintain the “Status Quo” May be Different where the Status Quo is “Dynamic”

By Jim Cline and Peter Haller

In WA Interpreters v. PERC and Dept of Labor & Industries, the Washington State Court of Appeals affirmed a PERC decision which ruled that the bargaining rights of interpreters were not violated when the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) implemented a new policy during the pendency of a representation petition. The policy at issue related to working conditions as it controlled how the interpreters could schedule appointments and receive payments.

[Read more…]

PERC Applies Narrow Direct Dealing Standard In School Bus Driver Decision

By Jim Cline & Peter Haller

In Bethel School District, Examiner Whitney partially dismissed a complaint that alleged that the Employer had engaged in direct dealing even though it had directly proposed a plan to employees without union representation present and misreported the status of the meetings to the union.

[Read more…]

Snohomish Corrections Guild Misfires Widely, Excoriated by Examiner in Dismissal of all Eleven of its ULP Claims

By Jim Cline

In a decision using scorching language in Snohomish County, Examiner Leonard entirely dismissed all 11 claims the Snohomish County Corrections Guild filed against Snohomish County. While the claims varied in issue, Examiner Leonard found that for each allegation, the Guild did not support their claims with sufficient evidence, failing to upload their burden of proof.  The Guild’s conduct was characterized as reprehensible by the Examiner as he discussed whether to impose attorney fees for multiple frivolous claims.

[Read more…]

PERC Examiner Holds Reallocation of DSHS Investigators to Non-bargaining Unit Position Constitutes ULP

By Jim Cline

In Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Examiner Elizabeth Snyder found that the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (Employer) unilaterally changed working conditions for two Washington Federation of State Employees (Union) employees when it removed their new positions from the bargaining unit. The Employer’s unilateral change constituted a refusal to bargain because it changed the conditions of the employees’ employment and impacted working conditions, which are a mandatory subject of bargaining.

[Read more…]

Where the Sun Don’t Shine: Spokane County Can’t Require Unions to Agree to Public Negotiations

By James Cline and Stephen Hatton

In Spokane County, Decision 13435 (PECB, 2021), PERC Hearing Examiner Erin Slone-Gomez found that the County had violated its duty to bargain in good faith by insisting their negotiation sessions with the Corrections Union be open to the public. She found ground rules for negotiations to be a permissive subject of bargaining.

[Read more…]

Melting Snowflakes: PERC Hearing Examiner holds that Union Rep’s Abusive Outbursts Crossed the Line into Bad Faith Bargaining

By Jim Cline and Stephen Hatton

In Ben Franklin Transit, Hearing Examiner Dario De La Rosa found that a Teamsters Union Representative had engaged in bad faith bargaining because of his hostile, discriminatory, and abusive conduct at the bargaining table.

[Read more…]